>For starters, the code that we generate is for a virtual machine (MATLAB) >with an instruction set that is not published. However, I wouldn't say that P code >is not as well protected as compiled code.
Norris wrote: >I couldn't reference your web link below, so I couldn't read the >discussion (was it a CSSM thread?). raymond Michael Robbins writes to say: Michael Schweisguth 00:00. I'm not saying it's impossible to reverse engineer our generated P code, but. On the other hand, it wouldn't be to difficult to find an instruction set for a particular chip (under 60 secs at ), that I could then spend sometime to reverse engineer.
